<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; msn ppc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benmoskel.com/tag/msn-ppc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benmoskel.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 11:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MSN Content Network: Money-Suck or Gold Mine?</title>
		<link>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/08/msn-content-network-money-suck-or-gold-mine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/08/msn-content-network-money-suck-or-gold-mine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Moskel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn adcenter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msn ppc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benmoskel.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently tested two campaigns on MSN’s content network. It is well known that Google’s content network is a reliable source of targeted traffic. However, I have had a few shaky experiences with Yahoo and MSN’s content network in the past.
Thus, for the most part, we focused more on optimizing our Google content network campaigns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We recently tested two campaigns on <a href="http://adcenter.msn.com">MSN’s content network</a>. It is well known that Google’s content network is a reliable source of targeted traffic. However, I have had a few shaky experiences with Yahoo and MSN’s content network in the past.</p>
<p>Thus, for the most part, we focused more on optimizing our Google content network campaigns as opposed to dissecting Yahoo and MSN’s wildly unpredictable content campaigns.</p>
<p>However, after seeing quite a few very targeted content ads well placed in MSN content pages, I decided that MSN’s content network deserves a closer look. While I cannot say which campaigns we tested, I can say that they were affiliate offers in two completely unrelated industries.</p>
<p>We invested $2,500 over the course of 4 weeks and purchased over 4,000 clicks. The bottom line is that MSN’s content network, while still somewhat unpredictable, is much improved and can be a source of unbelievably targeted prospects.</p>
<p>Specifically, here are our discoveries:</p>
<p>1.    <strong>We found  a handful of placements that reliably show conversion rates of up to 10X higher than similar traffic from Google and Yahoo paid search campaigns</strong>.</p>
<p>2.    Ads for products in some industries (Think financial niche) will bring traffic, but almost a non-existent conversion ratio.</p>
<p>3.    The number of different web properties is limited – even with a broad appeal type campaign, e.g. business opportunity, which had over 10,000 different keywords.</p>
<p>4.    You have good control over your placements including the ability to exclude properties as well as access reports on where your ads were served.</p>
<p>5.    Placement reports are available quickly, sometimes only 10-12 hours following the visit. (Compare this with Google’s placement reports which are available 48-72 hours following the visit)</p>
<p>6.    Placement targeting campaigns are an option although operating a placement targeted campaign is a challenge because of the limited number of available properties.</p>
<p>7.    The advertising reps are helpful and willing to set up a content only campaign if you request. (They’ll even identify keywords which are likely to trigger good traffic on the content network)</p>
<p>The bottom line is that MSN content traffic is much improved. Traffic is limited and sometimes poorly targeted. However, it is worth the time and resources to invest in a new test campaign to identify the small number of properties that consistently bring you targeted visitors. Of course, you should expect investing a reasonable amount of time up front monitoring your traffic and excluding any irrelevant properties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/08/msn-content-network-money-suck-or-gold-mine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
