<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; approved for affiliate programs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benmoskel.com/tag/approved-for-affiliate-programs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benmoskel.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:51:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Get Approved for Affiliate Programs: Chicken versus Egg Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/12/how-to-get-approved-for-affiliate-programs-chicken-versus-egg-problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/12/how-to-get-approved-for-affiliate-programs-chicken-versus-egg-problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Moskel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affiliate Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[approved for affiliate programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benmoskel.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got this question from a member of my online mastermind group of affiliate marketers:
I&#8217;m encountering the following barrier:

Whenever I wish to review products/brands offered on a new affiliate
partner site, I cannot view them unless I sign up.  To do that, I need
an active website with a history of traffic and relevance.  I have one
site [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this question from a member of my online mastermind group of affiliate marketers:</p>
<p><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">I&#8217;m encountering the following barrier:<br />
</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">Whenever I wish to review products/brands offered on a new affiliate<br />
partner site, I cannot view them unless I sign up.  To do that, I need<br />
an active website with a history of traffic and relevance.  I have one<br />
site active, but I still get denied.  Then, I move on and try another<br />
affiliate partner site.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">So how can I get started and build an attractive site if I don&#8217;t know<br />
what products/brands that a potential affiliate partner program<br />
offers?  Just keep moving on to different partner programs until I get<br />
accepted.</span></em></p>
<p><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">I do belong to CJ.  So, should I just stick with that program until I<br />
build a successful website to demonstrate to others?  Receiving<br />
commissions so long after the fact is not attractive.  So, I&#8217;m more<br />
interested in partner programs with shorter payout time frames.</span></em></p>
<p>I believe that most new affiliates run into this problem. To<br />
understand this problem, let me give you a 30 second history of<br />
<a href="http://www.benmoskel.com">affiliate marketing</a>:</p>
<p>You may have heard people refer to affiliates as &#8220;publishers.&#8221; The<br />
reason why is because the earliest affiliate marketers were<br />
&#8220;publishers&#8221; in the sense that they published content about a certain<br />
topic, e.g. news, hobbies, etc.</p>
<p>The publishers were publishers before they were affiliates.</p>
<p>Advertisers knew that the  publishers already had traffic and tons of content and<br />
basically purchased advertising space from the publishers.</p>
<p>Affiliate Marketing has evolved since then of course. Nonetheless,<br />
many advertisers still expect the same standards when they accept new affiliates.</p>
<p>In other words, advertisers expect you to already have good relevant<br />
content on your website which matches their offers. This makes sense<br />
for those new affiliates who are fairly sure about the field you want to<br />
get into.</p>
<p>If you want to quickly become &#8220;legitimate&#8221; in the eyes of the<br />
advertiser, here are some ways to beef up your website and have a<br />
better shot at getting approved:</p>
<p>1. Post articles on your site. You can get free article feeds from a<br />
lot of the article directories so long as you leave the resource boxes<br />
intact and give proper credit to the author;</p>
<p>2. Post relevant videos from Youtube and other video sites. These<br />
sites offer an &#8220;embed code&#8221; so you can cut and paste a video in no<br />
time flat</p>
<p>3. Post testimonials about a product or service. You can use your own<br />
or see what other people are saying online</p>
<p>Finally, one more tip on getting approved:</p>
<p>See whether the offer is available outside of Commission Junction. An<br />
advertiser is often partnered with several networks. Sometimes I&#8217;ve<br />
been rejected for an offer in Cj, but approved in a different network<br />
like ncsreportng.com.</p>
<p>Oh yeah &#8211; make certain you always include all the necessary<br />
formalities on your site, e.g. privacy policy, contact info, etc.</p>
<p>And if all else fails, you can always go out of your way to get an<br />
advertiser&#8217;s attention. (I used &#8220;snail mail&#8221; before to get the<br />
attention of an advertiser who was totally inundated with applications<br />
and it worked!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.benmoskel.com/2009/12/how-to-get-approved-for-affiliate-programs-chicken-versus-egg-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
